A teaching tool for noticing the everyday restrictions that aren't always named, and sitting with the harder question: why is restriction so often where we start?
Step 1 of 8
Before we begin
Restrictions are not benign. Even when no one intends harm, restricting someone shapes their life. It limits what they can do, when they can do it, and how much say they have in their own day.
Most unintentional restrictions come from routine, risk aversion, staffing constraints, or "this is how we've always done it" — not from a conscious decision to restrict. This tool isn't about catching anyone out. It's about noticing.
The most important thing this tool will ask you to sit with: restriction should be a last option, not a first one. This walk-through helps you notice when that order has been reversed.
This is a learning tool, not a documentation tool. For formal restrictive practice assessment, use the RP Toolkit on the main resources page. Don't enter or save any private client information here.
Set the scene
These details just help you focus your thinking. Nothing is saved or shared — every selection stays on your device. All clicking, no typing.
Roughly how old is the person you're thinking about?
Which state or territory?
Frameworks for restrictive practice vary by state and territory. Always check your local guidance.
Who is implementing the restriction?
Regardless of category, what matters is the impact on the person being restricted.
The person being restricted is the centre of this. Hold them in mind as you go.
Which type of restriction?
Pick the category most relevant to what you're thinking about right now. You can walk through the others later.
Tick the items you're noticing in this person's situation, or that you want to investigate further. Your ticks stay on this device.
Before we go further — why?
Before we run a 5-principles check on these restrictions, stop here.
The 5 principles aren't about whether to restrict. They're about how to manage the restriction we've already landed on. That means before we get there, we need to ask: why is restricting our first port of call?
The work in this step is in the noticing. Don't rush to answer. Sit with each prompt.
Bookmark the ones you want to sit with longer. The star is just a marker for you — no one else sees it.
If your answers to these don't sit well, that's the work. Restriction is not the only option. It might not even be the best one.
The 5 principles
Now — having sat with why — work through whether the restriction is justified to keep existing in this person's life. These aren't a checkbox. They're a test of your thinking.
For each principle, mark your current sense: yes, not sure, or not really. This is for your thinking — nothing is saved.
Underpinning all of these: human rights and choice. The person has the right to take risks, to make decisions about their own life, and to be supported to do so. A restriction that meets the 5 principles still needs to be questioned regularly. A restriction that doesn't meet them shouldn't exist.
How to bring this up
If you've spotted a restriction worth investigating further, the next question is how to raise it with the people involved. This is delicate work. Most people implementing unintentional restrictions are well-meaning. The goal isn't to call anyone out — it's to slowly shift what gets noticed.
Click each section to expand the suggestions. Read what fits your situation.
+With families or carers
Lead with curiosity, not correction. Most families have never had words for what they're doing.
Acknowledge the load they're carrying. Restrictions often emerge from exhaustion, not malice.
Ask what they were trying to manage. They may name a need that has other solutions.
Avoid "restrictive practice" as a label early on. It can sound clinical and accusatory. Start with what the person experiences.
+With team members
Name what you're noticing, not what they're doing wrong. "I've been wondering whether we're the ones who need to flex here" lands differently from "you're using a restrictive practice".
Make it about the person, not the procedure. "What does this look like from their side?"
Be ready for "we've always done it this way". Ask what would change if a new person joined the team next week.
+When you're the person being asked to implement it
You're allowed to ask why. You're allowed to ask what was tried first.
If you've been told to do something that feels restrictive, you're not the only one who needs to think about this. Loop in your supervisor.
Documenting your concerns is not betrayal. It's the start of change.
Conversations like these usually don't change anything in one go. The goal is to put a question into the air that wasn't there before.
What you've reflected on
You walked through one category of restriction, noticed the kinds of things that often happen without being named, sat with why restriction is so often the first option, ran the 5 principles, and thought about how to raise this conversation. That's the loop.
Take this with you
PDF preview will appear here once the printable for this category is added.
This was learning, not documentation. For formal restrictive practice assessment, use the RP Toolkit on the main resources page. The goal here is to build the noticing — the formal work happens elsewhere.